Currently submitted to: JMIR Biomedical Engineering
Date Submitted: Jul 10, 2019
Open Peer Review Period: Jul 15, 2019 - Sep 9, 2019
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note “no longer under consideration” will appear above).
Peer-review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a “Peer-Review Me” button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed “version of record” (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Validation of a cloud based ecosystem for behavioral and physical monitoring in free-living context
Smartphone usage is widely spreading in the society. Functions and sensors embedded in these devices may play an importnat role in healthcare monitoring and intervention planning. However, the usage of smartphone as a relevant tool for intrapersonal continuous behavioral and physical monotoring is not yet fully supported by adequate studies addressing technical reliability and acceptance.
The objective of this paper is to identify and discuss technical issues that may impact on the wide usage of smartphones as clinical monitoring tools. Main focus is on the quality of the acquired data and the transparency of the data acquisition process to the user daily life.
QuantifyMyPerson (QMP) is a complete architecture for continuous acquisition of smartphone usage features and embedded sensors data. The platform consists of a mobile app running on the smartphone for data acquisition, a backend cloud server for data storing and processing and a web-based dashboard for users' management and data visualization. The data processing is aimed at the extraction of meaningful features for the description of the daily life accoridng ot the existing literature. These features include phone switching on and off, calls, apps usage, GPS and accelerometer data. 12 health subjects installed on their personal smartphones and run the mobile app for and overall period of 7 months. The acquired data were analysed to assess their quality in terms of impact on the daily life of the smartphone (i.e. battery consumption and anomalies in functioning) as well as data integrity. Data integrity was computed as the ratio of app running time and total smartphone working time. Relevance of the selected features in describing changes in daily life was assessed through the computation of a k-NN Global Anomaly Score aimed at detecting days that "differ" from the others with the aim of using the platform to trigger potential modification in daily lifestyle.
The effectiveness of smartphone-based continuous monitoring depends on the acceptability and interoperability of the system to increase users' retention and on integrity of the acquired data. Acceptability was confirmed by the full transparency of the app once installed and the absence of any anomaly in smartphone usage when the mobile app is running. The only negative issue pointed out in acceptability was the battery consumption. Even if the trend of battery drain with and without mobile app running was comparable, the users complain about this. Referring interoperability, the app was successfully installed and run on several brands and models of Android-based smartphones. It has to be pointed out that some smartphone manufacturers implement power saving policies that do not allow a continuous acquisition of data from embedded sensors so impacting on data integrity. Data integrity was 96% on smartphones without power saving policies and 84% overall.
The results of the testing pointed out two main issues that may impact on spreading of continuous behavioural and physical monitoring in free living conditions. On one side there is the battery consumption. However the issue, mainly due to GPS triangulation is limited. It is expected that users motivated to have the app running on their smartphone because of health or wellness related aims may better accept the increasing in battery consumption. On the other side there are the power saving policies of some manufacturing impacting on the continuity of data acquisition. Also this aspect revealed to be not highly relevant in daily life. Because the embedded sensors are re-activated by any event happening on the smartphone, the missing data demonstrated to be related to periods of non usage of the phone in which the activity data would have been anyway null. The key need to have continuous monitoring running on any smartphone to assure no impact in daily habits widely justifies the partial data loss. According to the results of this feasibility test, wide spreading of continuous monitoring on the end user side seem to be fully feasible. Quality of data processing, depending on specific aims of the investigation, as well as usage of the data from the clinical operators is not part of this paper and require further investigation.
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.